PUBLIC DEBATE: RELIABILITY OF CREATION
1999, Somewhere else in this globe.
Pastor: Yes, everything is created by the Supreme God.
Barrister79: How certain are you about it?
Pastor: Very certain. It is in the Bible, in Genesis.
Barrister79: I am not asking you if it is in the Bible or not. How true is it?
Pastor: It is the word of God. It is true, of course.
Barrister79: You seemed to have no understanding of the question, Pastor. Alright, since you are talking about Genesis, I think it is proper to start at the beginning. Can you please read Genesis 1:1?
Pastor: [stated the verse with his memory] “In the beginning the God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.” Genesis:1:1-2
Barrister79: Is that what you call proof word of god?
Pastor: Yes.
Barrister79: Is it not a direct declaration of the writer?
Pastor: God instructed him.
Barrister79: Where in the Genesis that god instructed his or her writer to write something for him?
Pastor: What do you mean?
Barrister79: Authority. The authority of the writer to write for god.
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: No answer. How did the writer know the earth has no form and it was void?
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: No answer. How did the writer know it was the spirit of god that moved in the face of the waters?
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: No answer. Was the writer a real witness of creation?
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: Was the writer present while god is in the process of creation and witnessed the entire incidents?
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: Why can’t you just tell all of us that the entire tales of creation is a matter of theology? No need to answer this question, I think we are not interested with your theology.
-
Recent
- Business Lessons 6: Systematic Designation
- Questions on Sound Business Practice
- The Defects of the “Proof of Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt”
- Business Lessons 5: Management Guides
- CONDEMNATIONS ON ACTS AGAINST WOMEN
- Business Lessons 4: Questions on Capital
- DEATH OF A PERSON AFTER SEXUAL AFFAIRS: Questions
- Ancient Legal Doctrines Involved in Negligence Cases: Comments and Simplified Explanation
- The Salient Features of Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince”
- COMMENTS ON THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
- Comments on the Jurisdictions of the International Criminal Court
- My Analysis on the Territorial Application of Criminal Law
-
Links
-
Archives
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (3)
- May 2008 (7)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (22)
- January 2008 (4)
-
Categories
- American Politics
- Argumentation & Debate
- Bible
- Business
- Business & Strategy
- Business Consultancy
- Business Lesson
- Business Philosophy
- Catholicism
- Civil Law
- Commentary
- Common Sense
- Conspiracy Theory
- Corruption
- Criticism
- Cross-Examination
- Elegy
- Epistemology
- Ethics
- Existential Atheism
- Existentialism
- FreeThinker Philosophy
- God
- Hermeneutics
- Heroism
- Human Rights Advocacy
- International Traditions
- Interpretation & Construction
- Jean Paul Sartre
- Jurisprudence
- Language
- Law
- Law on Negligence
- Legal Hypocrisy
- Legal System
- Memory
- Moral Standards
- Niccolo Machiavelli
- Philosophy
- Political Philosophy
- Politics
- Proposed Legislation
- Psychology
- Questioning
- Religion
- Rene Descartes
- Rhetorical Prayer
- Rhetorics
- Semantics
- Skepticism
- Strategic Questioning
- Theology
- Thesis
- Truth
- Uncategorized
- War
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Questions on Sound Business Practice
As we all know, the thing called “sound business practice” requires correct thinking and good perspective on things. Everyday, we encounter some difficult questions, some of them may become the basis of our business judgments. The intent of this page is to encourage anyone to ask the question pertaining to business, and I will surely provide a good answer to it for free.
A friend asked me two days ago and this is her question:
“Someone offers me a free installation services but he provides the materials to be installed, shall I accept it?”
ANSWER:
“Reject it. In business, when someone offers you an advantage at their own expense, it is something either with a concealed intent or a fraudulent element. Do not take the bait of “free services”, it will indirectly ruin your expenses. In philosophy it says, ‘free labor can avail of an unlimited favor’. I hope it helps you.”
You can ask your question too.
August 20, 2009 Posted by barrister79 | Business, Business & Strategy, Business Consultancy, Business Lesson, Business Philosophy, Commentary, Common Sense, Law, Legal System, Questioning, Strategic Questioning | Business & Strategy, Business Lesson, Business Philosophy, Governance and Administration, International Legal Principle | No Comments Yet