PUBLIC DEBATE: RELIABILITY OF CREATION
1999, Somewhere else in this globe.
Pastor: Yes, everything is created by the Supreme God.
Barrister79: How certain are you about it?
Pastor: Very certain. It is in the Bible, in Genesis.
Barrister79: I am not asking you if it is in the Bible or not. How true is it?
Pastor: It is the word of God. It is true, of course.
Barrister79: You seemed to have no understanding of the question, Pastor. Alright, since you are talking about Genesis, I think it is proper to start at the beginning. Can you please read Genesis 1:1?
Pastor: [stated the verse with his memory] “In the beginning the God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.” Genesis:1:1-2
Barrister79: Is that what you call proof word of god?
Pastor: Yes.
Barrister79: Is it not a direct declaration of the writer?
Pastor: God instructed him.
Barrister79: Where in the Genesis that god instructed his or her writer to write something for him?
Pastor: What do you mean?
Barrister79: Authority. The authority of the writer to write for god.
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: No answer. How did the writer know the earth has no form and it was void?
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: No answer. How did the writer know it was the spirit of god that moved in the face of the waters?
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: No answer. Was the writer a real witness of creation?
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: Was the writer present while god is in the process of creation and witnessed the entire incidents?
Pastor: It is a matter of Theology.
Barrister79: Why can’t you just tell all of us that the entire tales of creation is a matter of theology? No need to answer this question, I think we are not interested with your theology.
-
Recent
- Business Lessons 6: Systematic Designation
- Questions on Sound Business Practice
- The Defects of the “Proof of Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt”
- Business Lessons 5: Management Guides
- CONDEMNATIONS ON ACTS AGAINST WOMEN
- Business Lessons 4: Questions on Capital
- DEATH OF A PERSON AFTER SEXUAL AFFAIRS: Questions
- Ancient Legal Doctrines Involved in Negligence Cases: Comments and Simplified Explanation
- The Salient Features of Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince”
- COMMENTS ON THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
- Comments on the Jurisdictions of the International Criminal Court
- My Analysis on the Territorial Application of Criminal Law
-
Links
-
Archives
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (3)
- May 2008 (7)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (22)
- January 2008 (4)
-
Categories
- American Politics
- Argumentation & Debate
- Bible
- Business
- Business & Strategy
- Business Consultancy
- Business Lesson
- Business Philosophy
- Catholicism
- Civil Law
- Commentary
- Common Sense
- Conspiracy Theory
- Corruption
- Criticism
- Cross-Examination
- Elegy
- Epistemology
- Ethics
- Existential Atheism
- Existentialism
- FreeThinker Philosophy
- God
- Hermeneutics
- Heroism
- Human Rights Advocacy
- International Traditions
- Interpretation & Construction
- Jean Paul Sartre
- Jurisprudence
- Language
- Law
- Law on Negligence
- Legal Hypocrisy
- Legal System
- Memory
- Moral Standards
- Niccolo Machiavelli
- Philosophy
- Political Philosophy
- Politics
- Proposed Legislation
- Psychology
- Questioning
- Religion
- Rene Descartes
- Rhetorical Prayer
- Rhetorics
- Semantics
- Skepticism
- Strategic Questioning
- Theology
- Thesis
- Truth
- Uncategorized
- War
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS